Community Meeting Notes: Shale Gas Extraction
As part of its strategic planning process WPF held twelve facilitated meetings, involving nearly 150 civic leaders, practitioners, public officials, and subject-matter experts in areas related to our grantmaking.
The following are notes taken at a meeting held on September 12, 2011 to discuss how WPF should approach issues related to the rapidly expanding extraction of natural gas from Pennsylvania's lands.
Individuals participated with the understanding that they were speaking without attribution, so their names are intentionally omitted from these notes.
The
impact of Marcellus Shale natural gas development is a paramount issue for
Pennsylvania communities and its people.
The number of new permits and drill sites in the Marcellus Shale
formation is increasing rapidly across the state, and the current moratorium on
drilling in the Delaware River Basin is likely to end in the near future. The
Foundation is interested in having a discussion about Marcellus Shale and the
role we could play to ensure that natural gas development occurs in a way that
is protective of the natural resources and communities where drilling is
occurring. This is not a debate on
whether or not natural gas development should occur in the Marcellus Shale
region, but on what can be done to protect public health and the
environment.
In
the last year or so, the Foundation has awarded grants related to Marcellus
Shale issues out of the Environment & Communities’ water resources priority
to support data analysis and research regarding gas extraction in the Delaware
Basin and for statewide policy and advocacy to promote adequate regulation of
the industry. We invited representatives
of the field to discuss potential approaches and priorities beyond those of our
water program that should be considered to help ensure that shale development
occurs in a way that is safe for communities and has the least impact on the
environment as well as supports community and economic development.
What
specific issue(s) do you see as a priority relating to Marcellus Shale over the
next couple of years, the next decade? Why? How might some of these issues be addressed?
Are there specific opportunities due to factors such as focus of strong
leadership, sensitive areas or populations, etc? What external factors or
concerns should the Foundation consider?
Major Points from the Discussion
Environmental/health Issues. Need to manage the environmental impact and
understand the cumulative impact on public health, environmental health, and
species. Air issues are a priority since the impact of extraction on air quality
is compounded in the eastern United States (versus western) due to existing air
quality issues. There is limited
information on cumulative impacts for water management and how to manage those
impacts to protect public drinking water. It is the age old problem of
environmental process going faster than environmental policy.
Community
issues. The state of public debate on Marcellus Shale
is terrible and the establishment of places where people can learn what experts
are thinking over time is needed. There is tension between people who are
profiting and those who are being displaced.
Some communities are experiencing increased homelessness and social
service needs as a result of the arrival of new workers. Some municipalities that are trying to be progressive
in terms of zoning and establishing other infrastructure-related policies are
being sued. The economic benefits of extraction not only affect core counties,
but also adjacent counties. There is a need to train residents to secure
extraction-related jobs and to understand what types of industries can be
attracted to a region because they are high natural gas users.
Government/policy. A clear task in the next couple of years is
to approve regulations specific to PA. There are significant questions about
the degree to which industry and federal agencies understand PA geology. PA local governments are not set up or given
authority by the state to address issues that are not constrained by local
boundaries, and regional-level services are critical to addressing impacts
(e.g., infrastructure) of extraction on communities. Drilling in PA is a long-term issue -- likely
to last 100 years--how do we maximize benefits so we are not just left with
down side of extraction? Industry has
been extremely successful at influencing the policy process and regulatory
agencies. Not clear what the cumulative impacts are or how the extraction
process will be managed and there is currently no format, venue, or process to
obtain this information.
Data: There is little available data on ecosystem
impacts and baseline chemistry. Different parties are doing small slices of
data collection and there is not a lot of support for such work. Little-to-no
health data exists, and there is no evidence that data on health issues are
being collected. There is a huge need to use best available science to
understand issues and best available technology to address issues and shape the
policy conversation. There is limited access to data from other states and
industry has data but it is considered proprietary. The public at large feels
they do not have information. The industry has invested early and heavily in
communications that have a particular frame and agenda, but there is nothing
comparable coming from a neutral party or advocates on the other side.
Information/data. Build a
trustworthy body of information and data over time and look at cumulative
impacts. Help transfer research/data into policy and help advocacy/legal
organizations get access to experts on natural gas industry.
Media. High quality investigative journalism can
help analyze data and provide objective information through a popular
narrative. Support fact checking, awards
to the press, white papers, etc.
Shareholder/market
activity.
Natural gas companies may be most influenced by their shareholders and private
regulators, such as the insurance industry.
Work with shareholders to translate environmental and health concerns
into shareholder resolutions and industry adoption of best practices.
Policy/regulations. Support
development of good policies and advocacy organizations to push issues in the
long-term, using good scientific information.
Create a Scorecard that regularly updates status of policy and
regulations.
Public
Space. Convene highly-regarded people from the
natural gas industry, insurance, environment, and others to build consensus and
a larger strategic approach.
Economic
development.
Ensure that job training and education (secondary, post secondary) is occurring
to prepare local residents to access jobs in the natural gas industry or
supportive sectors.
Local
community assistance. Build the capacity of grassroots
organizations and trusted nonprofits to help communities and the public address
concerns with drilling, including access to lawyers as people consider leases
and paid water quality monitoring pre- and post-drilling. Support local
municipalities around zoning issues.